User talk:Dvhart

From RTwiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Questions)
(Questions)
 
(One intermediate revision by one user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
* Will IBM ever release TuningFork as FLOSS? -- [[User:abogani]]
 
* Will IBM ever release TuningFork as FLOSS? -- [[User:abogani]]
 
** Abogani, I don't work directly with TuningFork so I don't know what IBM is planning for it.  I am looking into getting an answer for you.  Please send me an email as I doubt I should be posting any IBM product plans on this wiki (you shouldn't have any trouble finding my IBM email address if you search an LKML archive ;-)
 
** Abogani, I don't work directly with TuningFork so I don't know what IBM is planning for it.  I am looking into getting an answer for you.  Please send me an email as I doubt I should be posting any IBM product plans on this wiki (you shouldn't have any trouble finding my IBM email address if you search an LKML archive ;-)
 
* Sorry for a stupid question, but still... The RT_PREEMPT_HOWTO says it is better to take a major kernel version, and then it says it is better to take the appropriate version of the patch. The current patch version is 2.6.22.1-rt9, and there are kernel versions 2.6.22.1 and 2.6.22(which is probably equal to 2.6.22.3). By the way, it is probably better to edit the howto, too...
 

Latest revision as of 08:09, 21 August 2007

I am notified via email when this page changes, so feel free to ask me questions by editing this page.

[edit] Questions

  • Do you really check this page? -- User:dvhart
    • Yes, I really do ;-)
  • Will IBM ever release TuningFork as FLOSS? -- User:abogani
    • Abogani, I don't work directly with TuningFork so I don't know what IBM is planning for it. I am looking into getting an answer for you. Please send me an email as I doubt I should be posting any IBM product plans on this wiki (you shouldn't have any trouble finding my IBM email address if you search an LKML archive ;-)
Personal tools