|
|
| Line 7: |
Line 7: |
| | This page is now deprecated.</b> | | This page is now deprecated.</b> |
| | </div> | | </div> |
| − |
| |
| − | {|class="wikitable"
| |
| − | ! List !! Description !! Subscribe !! Archive
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
| |
| − | | (LKML) Linux Kernel Development: technical discussions related to upstream and RT tree patches with all developers and maintainers.
| |
| − | | [http://www.tux.org/lkml/ LKML FAQ]
| |
| − | | [http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&r=1&w=2 The Aims Group]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
| |
| − | | Real-Time Linux Users: Release announcements, bug reports and handling, general usage questions, development or user-space tools (e.g. rt-test suite)
| |
| − | | [[MajorDomo]]
| |
| − | | [http://gmane.org/info.php?group=gmane.linux.rt.user GMANE], [http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rt-users spinics.net]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
| |
| − | | glibc open development list
| |
| − | | [http://sourceware.org/glibc/ Sourceware]
| |
| − | | [http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/ RedHat]
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''Note''' the subtle difference in description of ''linux-kernel'' and ''linux-rt-users'' lists above. The ''linux-rt-users'' list is intended for users who want to ask questions about using the -rt patch set. Kernel-related development issues about the real-time patchsets should be sent to the ''linux-kernel''.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Thomas Gleixner wrote regarding this:
| |
| − | <blockquote>
| |
| − | ''All patches against the RT tree should be posted to LKML. CCing rt-users is fine, but development needs to happen on the main kernel development list because only a few developers/maintainers are subscribed to rt-users.''
| |
| − | </blockquote>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Theodore Tso [http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org/msg00085.html wrote] regarding this:
| |
| − | <blockquote>
| |
| − | ''One of the reasons why we (in consultation with folks like Ingo and tglx) deliberatly didn't create a RT development list was that in order to promote getting -rt related patches into mainline as soon as possible, we wanted to keep patch and development discussion on LKML. For example, it's not clear that the ARM maintainer subscribes to linux-rt-users; furthermore the more patch discussion happens on LKML, it helps promote willingness of other kernel developers that CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT isn't going to go away, and will probably (hopefully!) be merged into mainline someday soon.''
| |
| − | </blockquote>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | If you are interested in sending improvements, please see the [[CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_Patch#Sending_patches|Sending Patches]] section of the [[CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT Patch]] page.
| |
