Mailinglists

From RTwiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(link to up-to-date archive)
(One intermediate revision by one user not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
| Real-Time Linux usage and configuration
 
| Real-Time Linux usage and configuration
 
| [[MajorDomo]]
 
| [[MajorDomo]]
| [http://gmane.org/info.php?group=gmane.linux.rt.user GMANE], [http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org/ Mail Archive]
+
| [http://gmane.org/info.php?group=gmane.linux.rt.user GMANE], [http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rt-users spinics.net]
 
|-
 
|-
 
| libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
 
| libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
''One of the reasons why we (in consultation with folks like Ingo and tglx) deliberatly didn't create a RT development list was that in order to [http://www.research-service.com/custom-research-paper.html research papers] promote getting -rt related patches into mainline as soon as possible, we wanted to keep patch and development discussion on LKML. For example, it's not clear that the ARM maintainer subscribes to linux-rt-users; furthermore the more patch discussion happens on LKML, it helps promote willingness of other kernel developers that CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT isn't going to go away, and will probably (hopefully!) be merged into mainline someday soon.''
+
''One of the reasons why we (in consultation with folks like Ingo and tglx) deliberatly didn't create a RT development list was that in order to promote getting -rt related patches into mainline as soon as possible, we wanted to keep patch and development discussion on LKML. For example, it's not clear that the ARM maintainer subscribes to linux-rt-users; furthermore the more patch discussion happens on LKML, it helps promote willingness of other kernel developers that CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT isn't going to go away, and will probably (hopefully!) be merged into mainline someday soon.''
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
  
 
If you are interested in sending improvements, please see the [[CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_Patch#Sending_patches|Sending Patches]] section of the [[CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT Patch]] page.
 
If you are interested in sending improvements, please see the [[CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_Patch#Sending_patches|Sending Patches]] section of the [[CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT Patch]] page.

Revision as of 16:02, 1 January 2011

List Description Subscribe Archive
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org development topics LKML FAQ The Aims Group
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Real-Time Linux usage and configuration MajorDomo GMANE, spinics.net
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com glibc open development list Sourceware RedHat

Note the subtle difference in description of linux-kernel and linux-rt-users lists above. The linux-rt-users list is intended for users who want to ask questions about using the -rt patch set. Kernel-related development issues about the real-time patchsets should be sent to the linux-kernel. Theodore Tso wrote regarding this:

One of the reasons why we (in consultation with folks like Ingo and tglx) deliberatly didn't create a RT development list was that in order to promote getting -rt related patches into mainline as soon as possible, we wanted to keep patch and development discussion on LKML. For example, it's not clear that the ARM maintainer subscribes to linux-rt-users; furthermore the more patch discussion happens on LKML, it helps promote willingness of other kernel developers that CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT isn't going to go away, and will probably (hopefully!) be merged into mainline someday soon.

If you are interested in sending improvements, please see the Sending Patches section of the CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT Patch page.

Personal tools