Mailinglists

From RTwiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Add link to Mail Archive)
(Add comment from Theodore Tso regarding list usage)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
| [http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/ RedHat]
 
| [http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/ RedHat]
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
'''Note''' the subtle difference in description of ''linux-kernel'' and ''linux-rt-users'' lists above. Please send no development stuff, e.g. patches, to ''linux-rt-users''. Use ''linux-kernel'' instead. Theodore Tso [http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org/msg00085.html wrote] regarding this:
 +
 +
''One of the reasons why we (in consultation with folks like Ingo and tglx) deliberatly didn't create a RT development list was that in order to promote getting -rt related patches into mainline as soon as possible, we wanted to keep patch and development discussion on LKML. For example, it's not clear that the ARM maintainer subscribes to linux-rt-users; furthermore the more patch discussion happens on LKML, it helps promote willingness of other kernel developers that CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT isn't going to go away, and will probably (hopefully!) be merged into mainline someday soon.''
 +
 +
See [[CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_Patch#Sending_patches|sending patches]] as well.

Revision as of 07:46, 21 December 2006

List Description Subscribe Archive
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org development topics LKML FAQ The Aims Group
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Real-Time Linux usage and configuration MajorDomo GMANE, Mail Archive
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com glibc open development list Sourceware RedHat

Note the subtle difference in description of linux-kernel and linux-rt-users lists above. Please send no development stuff, e.g. patches, to linux-rt-users. Use linux-kernel instead. Theodore Tso wrote regarding this:

One of the reasons why we (in consultation with folks like Ingo and tglx) deliberatly didn't create a RT development list was that in order to promote getting -rt related patches into mainline as soon as possible, we wanted to keep patch and development discussion on LKML. For example, it's not clear that the ARM maintainer subscribes to linux-rt-users; furthermore the more patch discussion happens on LKML, it helps promote willingness of other kernel developers that CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT isn't going to go away, and will probably (hopefully!) be merged into mainline someday soon.

See sending patches as well.

Personal tools