HOWTO: Build an RT-application
(→Application: Add empy Input/Output sections)
m (→Priority 99)
|(3 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)|
|Line 84:||Line 84:|
Do notconfigure application to run with priority 99. There are a few management threads which need to run with higher priority then your application, e.g. watchdogs threads.
===Userland spin locks===
===Userland spin locks===
Do notimplement your own spin locks. Use the priority inheritance futexes.
Latest revision as of 08:05, 8 January 2014
This document describes the steps to writing hard real time Linux programs while using the real time Preemption Patch. It also describes the pitfalls that destroy the real time responsiveness. It focuses on x86 and ARM, although the concepts are also valid on other architectures, as long as Glibc is used. (Some fundamental parts lack in uClibc, like for example PI-mutex support and the control of malloc/new behaviour, so uClibc is not recommended)
An RT-application is only able to operate correctly if the underlying OS and hardware are able to provide the needed determinism. That means a higher priority task can preempt a lower priority task. If for example a BIOS decides to use all CPU cycles for a very long time, no operating system or application can provide any latency guarantees. The whole system needs to be tuned and configured correctly.
The goal is to reduce (random) latency. This document is divided into for sections which explain how you can reduce latencies (if possibe)
A good real time behaviour of a system depends a lot on low latency interrupt handling. Taking a look at the x86 platform, it shows that this platform is not optimised for RT usage. Several mechanisms cause ISR latencies that can run into the 10's or 100's of microseconds. Knowing them will enable you to make the best design choices on this platform to enable you to work around the negative impact.
 System Management Interrupt (SMI) on Intel x86 ICH chipsets
System Management Interrupts are being generated by the power management hardware on the board. SMI's are evil if real-time is required. First off, they can last for hundreds of microseconds, which for many RT applications causes unacceptable jitter. Second, they are the highest priority interrupt in the system (even higher than the NMI). Third, you can't intercept the SMI because it doesn't have a vector in the CPU. Instead, when the CPU gets an SMI it goes into a special mode and jumps to a hard-wired location in a special SMM address space (which is probably in BIOS ROM). Essentially SMI interrupts are "invisible" to the Operating System. Although SMI interrupts are handled by 1 processor at a time, it even effects real-time responsiveness on dual-core/SMP systems, because if the processor handling the SMI interrupt has locked a mutex or spinlock, which is needed by some other core, that other core has to wait until the SMI interrupt handler has been completed and a mutex/spinlock has been released. This problem also exists on RTAI and other OS-es, see for more info 
 DMA bus mastering
Bus mastering events can cause long-latency CPU stalls of many microseconds. It can be generated by every device that uses DMA, such as SATA/PATA/SCSI devices and even network adapters. Also video cards that insert wait cycles on the bus in response to a CPU access can cause this kind of latency. Sometimes the behaviour of such peripherals can be controlled from the driver, trading off throughput for lower latency. The negative impact of bus mastering is independent from the chosen OS, so this is not a unique problem for Linux-RT, even other RTOS-es experience these type of latency!
 Power management
Many BIOS support power management for different hardware types. Obviously, enabling power management saves a few watts on the expensive of latency. Therefore, it is recommended to disable power management options or benchmark the performance of the whole system carefully for each options and their impact on latency.
 Hyper threading
Hyper threading and also out of order execution of CPUs introduces 'random' latencies. As mentioned in power management, it is recommended to disable these feature (if possible) or carefully benchmark the performance.
The latency should drop to ~10us permanently, at the expense of not being able to use the i8xx_tco watchdog.
One user of RTAI reported: In all cases, do not boot the computer with the USB flash stick plugged in. The latency will raise to 500us if you do so. Connecting and using the USB stick later does no harm, however.
 Kernel configuration
 On-demand CPU scaling
Creates long-latency events when the CPU is put in a low-power-consumption state after a period of inactivity. Such problems are usually quite easy to detect. (e.g. On Fedora the 'cpuspeed' tool should be disabled, as this tool loads the on-demand scaling_governor driver)
With this configuration option it is possible to disable the regular timer interrupt send all idle CPUs to deep sleep. Waking up CPUs and maintaining the time on the boot CPU (which never sleeps) is not for free. It adds considerable to latency.
 VGA Console
When the system is fulfilling its RT requirements the VGA Text Console must be left untouched. Nothing is allowed to be written to that console, even printk's are not allowed. This VGA text console causes very large latencies, up to more than hundreds of microseconds. It is better to use a serial console and have no login shell on the VGA text console. Also SSH or Telnet sessions can be used. The 'quiet' option on the kernel command line could also be useful to prevent preventing any printk to reach the console. Notice that using a graphical UI of X has no RT-impact, it is just the VGA text console that causes latencies.
 Latencies caused by Page-faults
There are 2 types of page-faults, major and minor pagefaults. Minor pagefaults are handled without IO accesses. Major page-faults are page-faults that are handled by means of IO activity. The Linux page swapping mechanism can swap code pages of an application to disk, it will take a long time to swap those pages back into RAM. If such a page belongs to the realtime process, latencies are hugely increased. Page-faults are therefore dangerous for RT applications and need to be prevented.
If there is no Swap space being used and no other applications stress the memory boundaries, then there is probably enough free RAM ready for the RT application to be used. In this case the RT-application will likely only run into minor pagefaults, which cause relatively small latencies. Notice that pagefaults of one application cannot interfere the RT-behavior of another application.
During startup a RT-application will always experience a lot of pagefaults. These cannot be prevented. In fact, this startup period must be used to claim and lock enough memory for the RT-process in RAM. This must be done in such a way that when the application needs to expose its RT capabilities, pagefaults do not occur any more.
This can be done by taking care of the following during the initial startup phase:
- Call directly from the main() entry the mlockall() call.
- Create all threads at startup time of the application. Never start threads dynamically during RT show time, this will ruin RT behaviour.
- Reserve a pool of memory to do new/delete or malloc/free in, if you require dynamic memory allocation.
- Never use system calls that are known to generate pagefaults, like system calls that allocate memory inside the kernel.
There are several examples that show the several aspects of preventing page-faults. It depends on the your requirements which suits best for your purpose.
- Simple memory locking example: Single threaded application doing a malloc() and make it safe to use.
- Dynamic memory allocation example: Same as Simple memory locking example, except it creates a pool of memory to be used for dynamic memory allocation
- Threaded RT-application with memory locking and stack handling example: Same as Dynamic memory allocation example, but now supports threads.
- mlockall() should be called within the application to prevent the page out of memory for the real time application.
 Global variables and arrays
Global variables and arrays are not part of the binary, but are allocated by the OS at process startup. The virtual memory pages associated to this data is not immediately mapped to physical pages of RAM, meaning that page faults occur on access. It turns out that the mlockall() call forces all global variables and arrays into RAM, meaning that subsequent access to this memory does not result in page faults. As such, using global variables and arrays do not introduce any additional problems for real time applications. You can verify this behaviour using the following program (run as 'root' to allow the mlockall() operation)
 Priority Inheritance Mutex support
On Linux luckily there is a solution for it in user-land since kernel version 2.6.18 together with Glibc 2.5 (PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT).
So, if user-land real-time is important, I highly encourage you to use a recent kernel and Glibc-library. Other C-libraries like uClibc do not support PI-futexes at this moment, and are therefore less suitable for realtime!
 Priority 99
Do not configure your application to run with priority 99. There are a few management threads which need to run with higher priority then your application, e.g. watchdogs threads.
 Userland spin locks
Do not implement your own spin locks. Use the priority inheritance futexes.
In general, I/O is dangerous to keep in an RT code path. This is due to the nature of most filesystems and the fact that I/O devices will have to abide to the laws of physics (mechanical movement, voltage adjustments, <whatever an I/O device does to retrieve the magic bits from cold storage>). For this reason, if you have to access I/O in an RT-application, make sure to wrap it securely in a dedicated thread running on a disjoint CPU from the RT-application.
 Sharing data between applications
Use mmap to pass data around.
 Device Drivers
Here are some tips on common pitfalls when writing a device driver.
 Interrupt Handling
The RT-kernel handles all the interrupt handlers in thread context. However, the real hardware interrupt context is still available. This context can be recognised on the IRQF_NODELAY flag that is assigned to a certain interrupt handler during request_irq() or setup_irq(). Within this context a much more limited kernel API is allowed to be used.
 Things you should not do in IRQF_NODELAY context
Calling any kernel API that uses normal spinlocks. Spinlocks are converted to mutexes on RT, and mutexes can sleep due its nature. (Note: the atomic_spinlock_t types behave the same as on a non-RT kernel) Some kernel API's that can block on a spinlock/RT-mutex:
- wake_up() shall not be used, use wake_up_process() instead.
- up() shall not be used in this context, this is valid for all semaphore types, thus both struct compat_semaphore, as well as struct semaphore. (of course the same is valid for down()...)
- complete(): Uses also a normal spinlock which is defined in 'struct __wait_queue_head' in wait.h, thus not safe.